Free TV networks push for anti-siphoning laws to include streaming services


Australia's free-to-air broadcasters are campaigning for reforms to the anti-siphoning legislation. Photo: TND
Australiaâs free-to-air television broadcasters are campaigning to keep sport on their channels, in a push to avoid pay-gating the most-watched events on streaming services.
Channel Seven, the Ten Network, Channel Nine and the WIN Network have launched the âFree for Everyoneâ campaign ahead of prominence and anti-siphoning legislation being debated on Tuesday.
It argued that the legislation, which means âiconic sports must be offered to TV broadcasters first so they donât end up behind a paywallâ, needs to be updated.
âIt is outdated and only guarantees your free sport if you watch it via broadcast TV, not if you stream it over the internet,â the campaignâs website said.
âThis is a problem, because we all know TV viewing is changing and more and more Aussies donât have access to an aerial or choose to watch their favourite sports through apps like 7plus.â
It is calling for the government to update the anti-siphoning legislation to cover streaming as well as broadcast television because âthere is nothing stopping Amazon Prime, Kayo and Netflix from buying all the digital rights to your favourite sports and making you pay if you want to stream your sport over the internetâ.
The legislation
The first anti-siphoning laws were launched in 1995, giving free TV broadcasters first refusal for certain events as paid subscription television grew in popularity.
But now another form of media, streaming, is disrupting the playing field.

Major sporting events â like every Australian menâs and womenâs game during the football World Cup â are on the anti-siphoning list. Photo: Getty
The Albanese government released an updated anti-siphoning and prominence legislation for consultation in November.
It focused on pinpointing how and where Australian content is displayed on televisions and updating the legislation to reflect the changing media landscape.
Minister for Communications Michelle Rowland said that âiconic sporting events and moments that bring us together as a nation wonât slip behind the online paywalls of international streaming servicesâ.
âThis bill promotes equitable access by Australians to free TV and sports coverage in the age of streaming services and connected TV devices,â she said when the draft legislation was released.
âThese changes help support a strong and sustainable media industry that delivers for all Australians.â
The government stated that because streaming services are not currently subject to the legislation, there is âno legal impediment to them acquiring the rights to iconic sporting events ahead of local free-to-air broadcastersâ.
Politics and sport
Appearing on Seven, former deputy prime minister and Nationals MP Barnaby Joyce called for Australians to continue to be able to watch sport on free-to-air television as a way to support journalism.
âThere are no journalists in your local town or suburb from Netflix or Stan or Binge,â he said.
âIf your journalists dig into how the nation works, you have to make sure enterprises like that make money and if they donât have free-to-air sport, they wonât make money.â
Currently, the Olympic Games, Commonwealth Games, the Melbourne Cup, the AFL grand final, NRL grand final, State of Origin, the Socceroos and Matildas World Cup games and qualifying, the World Cup final and the Australian Open tennis are some of the events included in the anti-siphoning list.
The minister has the power to add or remove events from the list.
Want to see more stories from The New Daily in your Google search results?
- Click here to set The New Daily as a preferred source.
- Tick the box next to "The New Daily". That's it.








