ASADA re-think appeal after Dank guilty verdict

Sports scientist Stephen Dank is likely to banned for life fromĀ the AFL after being found guilty by the AFLās anti-doping tribunal last night, although his punishment is yet to be determined.
Dank has maintained throughout the supplements saga that Essendon players were not injected with banned substances, and the tribunal agreed, although he was still found guilty of 10 breaches of the competitionās anti-doping code.
His likely expulsion means he will beĀ banned from the two biggest football codes in the country, after he was last year banned from the National Rugby League over his involvement with the Cronulla Sharks.
⢠CEO calls for AFL drug review
⢠Bombers werenāt given banned substances: Dank
⢠Pies perplexed over positive drug test
āThe Tribunal has found that the former Essendon support person has been found guilty of 10 breaches of the AFL Anti-Doping Code,ā an AFL statement read.
āThe breaches include trafficking, attempting to traffick and complicity in matters related to a range of prohibited substances.ā
According to the statement, which was released on Friday, the prohibited substances in question include thymosin beta-4 and CJC-1295, the peptide former NRL player Sandor Earl admitted to trafficking.
A decision on the sanctions for Dank will be made at a hearing on May 5.
āThe circumstances surrounding the case have been extremely difficult, given the amount of information and the number of parties involved,ā AFL general counsel Andrew Dillon said.
Prohibited substances involved in Dankās breaches
- Hexarelin
- Humanofort ā Ā (Insulin Growth Factor 1 (IGF-1), Insulin Growth Factor 2 (IGFā2), Mechano Growth Factor (MGF), Fibroblast Growth Factor (FGF), Follistatin and Thymosin Beta 4)
- CJC-1295
- GHRP6
- SARMS
In further developments, ASADA chiefĀ Ben McDevitt saidĀ he would be able to make an āinformed decisionā on whether to appeal the AFLās decision to clear 34 Essendon players of taking banned substances given the tribunalās decision on Dank.
McDevitt has until Tuesday next week to make his decision.
On its website, ASADA posted comment expressing its disappointment in the Dank verdict.
āASADA is disappointed in the tribunalās decision to clear Mr Dank of a number of serious alleged violations,ā the statement read.
āASADA notes that all 35 matters were heard concurrently by the tribunal. We also note the tribunal stated its preference was to release their decisions on all 35 matters at the same time. The reality however is that we have only just received the findings on Mr Dank. ASADA is disappointed that this comes as the window of appeal on the first 34 matters rapidly closes.
āASADA will now consider both decisions in their totality.ā
As always, social media delivered its own verdict on the tribunalāsĀ decision:
So the AFL is blaming Stephen Dank for everything. NOBODY at Essendon FC was guilty of anything. Of course not. #FFS what a joke.
ā Mal Booth (@malbooth) April 17, 2015
So the #Essendon players were not guilty of taking the drugs advocated, administered by #StephenDank but heās guilty for his part.
ā with AAP
Want to see more stories from The New Daily in your Google search results?
- Click here to set The New Daily as a preferred source.
- Tick the box next to "The New Daily". That's it.








