GP reform: more expensive, but less cash upfront
Patients visiting a GP clinic would pay more overall but less upfront under a counter-proposal to the Abbott governmentâs âill-thought-outâ co-payment.
In a written submission to a review of Medicare, the Australian Medical Association (AMA) lobbied for the power to impose extra costs, just five months after the new Health Minister finally put the doomed GP co-payment to rest.
A spokesman for the medical association criticised the government for failing to consult on the co-payment, saying the industryâs proposal would be âfairerâ.
⢠Young women are suffering a mental health crisis
⢠Why âeating for twoâ during pregnancy is wrong
⢠TV weight loss is a âdangerous fantasyâ
Under the proposal, Australians eligible for the Medicare rebate (most patients) would no longer have to pay the cost of the rebate upfront and then wait to be reimbursed. Instead, the GP would bill it directly to the government.
âIf youâre a person without the means â you have a couple of kids and ready cash flow problems â your credit card may be maxed out. There could be a whole host of reasons that having to pay upfront is difficult,â AMA spokesman Dr Bryan Morton told The New Daily.
In exchange, GPs would be able, at their discretion, to charge another upfront fee (called a âgap feeâ) on top of the Medicare rebate, which would go straight into their pockets â something they cannot do currently. This would eliminate the need for doctors to âtake a hitâ to help out poorer patients, the spokesman argued.
âIf it was someone who lived day-to-day who didnât qualify for any concessions, then they might only be asked to pay $5 out of their pocket. And thatâs affordable and fair,â Dr Morton said.
As a result, many patients would pay less upfront, but cost the system more. Others might be asked to pay a small upfront fee when in the past they had paid nothing upfront.
âPeople who can afford to pay can pay a small amount according to their means and the GPs can judge that.â
This system would be âmuch fairerâ than the co-payment because it would allow GPs to selectively impose the gap fee, whereas the co-payment was compulsory and probably would have applied to more patients, Dr Morton said.
Critics have long opposed the ability for doctors to direct bill the Medicare rebate and charge a gap fee because it was thought that Medicare costs could blow out as a result, driving up costs for everyone.
Dr Morton denied this.
âWell, thatâs not going to happen. Theyâre going to find that a lot of GPs only charge minimal, if anything, above the bulk billing rate.â
Health Minister Sussan Ley has ruled out any changes to Medicare until at least 2016, when the reform process is completed.
Her predecessor, Peter Dutton, failed to consult with the industry, the AMA spokesman said. If he had, the current proposal would have emerged, Dr Morton said.
âIt was a very ill-thought-out system.â
Want to see more stories from The New Daily in your Google search results?
- Click here to set The New Daily as a preferred source.
- Tick the box next to "The New Daily". That's it.








