The little Telstra rip-off: a cautionary tale
Will I never learn?
I read The New Dailyās story about Telstra in WednesdayāsĀ edition, a neat illustration of the telcoās modus operandi when it comes to customer affairs.
āTelstra customers whoĀ receive their bills on paper via mail or pay monthly accountsĀ face-to-face will be slugged $3.20 a bill, up $1.20 from the current $2 charge,ā itĀ explained.
āThe increase will take effect on 28 November.ā
⢠Telstra slammed for ādiscriminatoryā new billing charge
⢠Woolworths bagged over new rewards program
⢠What you need to know about the upcoming heatwave
⢠This is the best age to send your kids to schoolĀ
The storyĀ provocatively added that āTelstra recorded a profit last year of $4.3 billionā. Ouch.
I already knew about this. Iād received a notice a week or so ago, indicating that if I was to continue to require any dang-blasted ānon-electronic billingā, I was henceforth going to be out-of-pocket a further $1.20 a month.
Iād shrugged my shoulders and decided to live with it. You need to pick the battles worth fighting and let the rest, those innumerable lesser exploitations that litter the life of a consumer, go through to the keeper.Ā
Besides, my understanding was that Telstraās switch to electronic billing and payment had been in the interests of the environment.
Nothing wrong with that. By urging its customers away from paper, it was doing the right thing.
As a right-minded citizen I should be paying to get my bill in the mail, even if the only reason I was doing so was because the hard copy made it much easier to illustrate to the helpful person at my local Telstra shop how Iād been overcharged.
Nothing like a document covered in red question marks and exclamation points to get some attention.
However, Telstraās altruism is of a different order. Itās not concerned with the environment, only with covering costs.
The New DailyĀ tracked down a Telstra spokesperson who seized the opportunity to offer an official reassurance to customers, explaining that the extra charges were required in order to āpartiallyā offset the costs of processing all that paperwork.
Furthermore, nobody who could afford it would be disadvantaged, theĀ spokesperson said.
āPensioners and health care card holders are automatically exempt from this fee.Ā It is all set up with them whenĀ they connect or they advise us they have become eligible.ā
I have an Australian Government Health Care Card, I said to myself. I shouldnāt be paying any bloody fee.
In fact, Telstra owes me money, the fee Iāve been paying ever since the charge for doing non-electronic business was introduced.
I should āadviseā them of this. But then I made my big mistake.
And hereās where it all got seriously complicated. I really should have known better.
I rang the Customer Service Department, explained Telstraās billing mistake, requested reimbursement and a correction on future billing.
Polite Ryan explained to me down the crackly line from Manila that the Telstra system wasnāt able to āvalidateā my claim or my request.
So, no, he couldnāt do either of the things I was asking of him. I remained calm. I didnāt really have to ā protocol has it that nobody in the customer service business ever hangs up on a customer.
Not only is the call being recorded for training purposes, but pesky customers get to stay on the line to dole out numbers about how satisfied theyāve been with the call.
Or they might. But this wasnāt Ryanās fault. He was just doing what heād been told to in the customer service classes.
However, a moment or 20 later I was talking to polite May at the Complaints Department.
She seemed genuinely surprised that I was quibbling over such a small sum, but essentially endorsed what Ryan had said.
The Telstra system could not āvalidateā my complaint. By way of compromise for my troubles, she would reimburse the amount Iād already paid for the non-electronic billing, but Telstra could not remove the charge in future.
I said, that didnāt make sense and that I had no need to compromise, and I even heard myself saying that Iād look to taking my business elsewhere if the matter wasnāt sorted out.
May asked if I would hold the line while she consulted with her supervisor. Since Iād already been on the line for around 30 minutes, I asked if she could sort it out and call me back. Which she agreed to do.
It pays to check the fine print
While waiting, I checked the Telstra website. Bingo.
On the support page for Account & Billing,Ā the company endorses the spokespersonās claim.
Exemptions from the non-electronic payment and paper bill fee.
You wonāt be charged the non-electronic payment and paper bill fee if you:
⢠Are registered for Telstraās Pensioner Discount or Disability Equipment Program or hold an Australian Government Health Care Card.
⢠Use a Telstra Bill Assistance Program Certificate to make a payment.
⢠Donāt have an email address or internet access. However, you must pay your bill via automatic Direct Debit, PayPal or Bpay to avoid the $3.20 non-electronic processing fee.
May called me back and began to regurgitate the same guff all over again.
Even after I pointed out Telstraās policy, and even after she allowed that it did seem to say that the holder of a Government Health Care Card would be exempted from the fee, she insisted that there was nothing she could do.
Telstraās system couldnāt accommodate my request.
She said she was sorry but her hands were tied since the policy manual sheād been given included the instruction that, if anyone like me called, they were to be told that they werenāt eligible for an exemption from the fee if they had access to the internet.
What!!!???
Iād spent the best part of an hour keeping my cool, explaining my position and directing her to Telstraās information pages only to be told that there was another document, one to which no customer is privy, that was guiding her responses to me.
And deliberately setting out to deceive! What had begun as a fairly casual request had now, for me, become an urgent matter of principle.
I became aware that there was someone in the background prompting May and asked to be passed on to her/him.
Goodbye May, hello April. Iām not kidding. Telstra canāt even get the months in the right order!
It took a while, but April effectively conceded everything, that people on pensions and with health care cards should, under Telstraās terms, be exempted from paying the fee.
āBut please understand,ā she continued, āour system isnāt set up to allow this to happen.ā
āSo your systemās flawed, but your customers have to foot the bill so you donāt have to do anything about it?ā
āYou have a point, but I really canāt help you. What we have internally is a problem. But rest assured, we will not take your complaint lightly. And to help you, Iām going to pass your complaint on to the highest level, our Customer Relations Group and you will receive a phone call within the next day or so.ā
The wait continues
Iām still waiting.
But I really should have known better that to attempt to sort out anything with Telstra via the phone, which is of course its raison dāetre.
What I should have done is take my issues ā and the paperwork Telstra sends me ā down to the local Telstra shop where a group of smart, lively young men and women have, for years, helped me courteously and efficiently.
It took a little while to find the right Telstra shop, but once I did, Iāve never looked back.
Until today, when I thought the issue was so clear cut that nobody could get it wrong.
I was wrong. And I have learned.
Want to see more stories from The New Daily in your Google search results?
- Click here to set The New Daily as a preferred source.
- Tick the box next to "The New Daily". That's it.








