Meghan Markle wins case against tabloid over printing of private letter
Meghan Markle has won her privacy case against a tabloid newspaper that printed extracts of a letter she wrote to her estranged father.
The Duchess of Sussex expressed her gratitude to the courts for holding Mail on Sunday to account âfor their illegal and dehumanising practicesâ.
Meghan, 39, the wife of the Queenâs grandson, Prince Harry, had sued publisher Associated Newspapers after the tabloid printed parts of the handwritten letter she sent to her 76-year-old father, Thomas Markle, in August 2018.
Meghan wrote the five-page letter to her dad after their relationship collapsed in the run-up to her glittering wedding to Harry in May 2018, which Mr Markle missed due to ill health and after he admitted posing for paparazzi pictures.
In two days of hearings in January, her lawyers said printing the âpersonal and sensitiveâ letter was a âtriple-barrelledâ assault on the Duchessâ âprivate life, her family life and her correspondenceâ and plainly breached her privacy.
But the paper argued the Duchess intended the letterâs contents to become public and it formed part of a media strategy, pointing out she had admitted in court papers discussing it with her communications secretary.
The Mail, which published extracts in February 2019, said it did so to allow Mr Markle to respond to comments made by Meghanâs anonymous friends in interviews with the US magazine People.
âFor the most part they did not serve that purpose at all,â London High Court Judge Mark Warby said, ruling that the articles did breach Meghanâs privacy and were unlawful.
He said the Duchess âhad a reasonable expectation that the contents of the letter would remain privateâ, and the Mail on Sunday articles âinterfered with that reasonable expectationâ.
âIt was, in short, a personal and private letter. The majority of what was published was about the claimantâs own behaviour, her feelings of anguish about her fatherâs behaviour â as she saw it â and the resulting rift between them,â the judge said.
âThese are inherently private and personal matters.â
However, he said issues relating to her copyright of the letter would need to be settled at a trial.
Mr Warby said âthe only tenable justificationâ for the Mail on Sundayâs interference âwas to correct some inaccuraciesâ in an article in People magazine, which mentioned the handwritten letter.
But the judge said, âthe disclosures made were not a necessary or proportionate means of serving that purposeâ.
âTaken as a whole the disclosures were manifestly excessive and hence unlawful,â he added.
In a statement, the Duchess of Sussex said the damage caused by Associated Newspapers âruns deepâ.
âFor these outlets, itâs a game. For me and so many others, itâs real life, real relationships, and very real sadness,â she said.
Meghan said her âcomprehensive winâ means âwe have all wonâ.
âWe now know, and hope it creates legal precedent, that you cannot take somebodyâs privacy and exploit it in a privacy case, as the defendant has blatantly done over the past two years.â
The newspaper said it was considering an appeal.
âWe are very surprised by todayâs summary judgment and disappointed at being denied the chance to have all the evidence heard and tested in open court at a full trial,â the paper said in a statement.
âWe are carefully considering the judgmentâs contents and will decide in due course whether to lodge an appeal.â
There will be a hearing on March 2 to discuss next steps in the case.
-with AAP
Want to see more stories from The New Daily in your Google search results?
- Click here to set The New Daily as a preferred source.
- Tick the box next to "The New Daily". That's it.
